Jose Gonzalez Buenaposada/Getty Images

It’s not uncommon for audiophiles to get lost in the world of high-end equipment, spending thousands of dollars while never fulfilling their quest for the perfect soundstage. The reality so many audiophiles miss is that regardless of how high-quality your equipment is or how many cool new audio gadgets you’ve upgraded your music setup with, the basic, physical factors of an audio setup can be as important to cohesive sound as the brand of your speakers. That means making a plan of where you and your speakers are positioned in a room is crucial to getting the most from your audio experience.

According to Jim Smith, an audio expert, consultant, and author, the golden ratio is determined by the distance between your speakers in relation to where you are listening from. Smith, best known for this book (and brand) “Get Better Sound,” suggests that the distance between your speakers should be 83% of the distance between you and the midpoint of the plane between those speakers. While not a hard and fast rule, Smith uses that initial 83% measurement as a baseline when doing new installs and then adjusts from there.

How the 83% rule works

Customdesigner/Getty Images

To put it simply, the 83% rule measures two distances in a dual-speaker setup. The first measurement is the distance between your speakers. The second imagines the plane between the speakers as a flat line and measures the distance from the middle of that plane back to where a listener will be seated. The positioning forms a triangle, with the two speakers and the listener as the points of the triangle.

Smith recommends using the listening point as the anchor. With that set, you can begin by finding the optimal position for the two speakers and then make fine adjustments. The reason the rule works is basic acoustics. If the speakers are placed too widely, the stereo image can sound precise but disconnected, and the lower mids may not blend as naturally (Smith describes setups where distances have formed an equilateral triangle, which he says results in a technical sound but boring music presentation). If the speakers are placed too closely together, the presentation can collapse inward and lose width, and presentation is key, even if you’re just using Bluetooth speakers in your home gym.

Room setup examples

Ryanjlane/Getty Images

To set up your own space according to the 83% rule, you’ll want to start with the equation of X/Y=0.83, where the distance between your speakers is the X value and the listening distance from the midpoint is the Y value. From there, it’s just simple math. For example, if your speakers are 10 feet apart (representing X), then you should multiply that number by 0.83 to see that your optimal listening location is about 8.3 feet (Y) away from the midpoint. 

Of course, in smaller rooms that this rule isn’t possible, it may take more of a manual setup to get the sound just right. Also, be sure to account for toe-in, which is the angle you turn a speaker to face the listener(s). Once you have the spacing and seating roughly in place, you can angle the speakers inward and make small adjustments until vocals snap into focus and the presentation starts to feel musical rather than analytical. And while you’re setting up your rear speakers, don’t forget to check out the best soundbars you can buy in 2026.

Source

José Adorno/BGR

The iPad is the perfect device between the powerhouse that the Mac is and the always-on-the-go experience of the iPhone. Being an iPad user since the early days of this tablet has let me see it evolve from a “bigger iPhone” to a multitasking device that is also my favorite for watching my favorite TV shows, writing my thoughts, and exploring my creativity. From an iPad 2 to the iPad Pro M4, I had a range of iPad models, including Air and mini options. 

Over the years, I also tried hundreds of different apps. While I do think my most used apps on the iPad are usually Netflix, YouTube, Apple Music, and ExpressVPN — especially when I’m in different countries and I need to access specific content of a region –, these apps listed below contain a mix of taking advantage of the iPad’s big screen, its touch capabilities, and even the great combo of matching this tablet with a Magic Keyboard and Apple Pencil Pro. Bonus if, like me, you also have an iPad Pro with an M4 or M5 chip, as these tablets have the best display in Apple’s mainstream products and make everything you do pop up on the screen.

Goodnotes

José Adorno/BGR

Goodnotes is the app I never fully took advantage of in college, but it was my go-to whenever I had to open a PDF, mark up something, or even sign a document. Little did I know the powerful app it was for taking notes, organizing my thoughts, and studying languages. With this app, you can create several notebooks and split them between subjects, ideas, or whatever you feel like. Currently, I use Goodnotes the most to study Italian and French, as I have specific tabs for my classes. I can add photos, PDFs, add handwritten notes, and even use tools that make my notebook look a lot better.

Even though I bought Goodnotes 5 so many years ago, Goodnotes now focuses on a subscription-based plan, which includes AI, so you can brainstorm, mind-map and diagram on an infinite canvas, record and transcribe audio meetings in real time, and even create documents that bring ideas with external insights, while still letting you collaborate with teammates. While I use GoodNotes as a personal app, the AI part wasn’t an attractive upgrade. I highly recommend this app to anyone in college, taking several meetings, or just wanting well-organized notebooks. The best part is the great integration with Apple Pencil, as this is the only way I use this app with a 13-inch iPad.

Photomator

José Adorno/BGR

Apple acquired Pixelmator software and its team a couple of years ago. Way before that, I was already using this company’s software around the iPad Air 2 release and Apple’s great focus on Machine Learning, which we all now see the company calling AI. At the time, the app was called Pixelmator Photo and was eventually rebranded as Photomator. What made this app so incredible at the time was its ability to quickly fine-tune any of the photos I took, and it also offered a powerful eraser tool that, even though it wouldn’t drastically change any image, could remove certain objects, people, or other things that seemed off. The best part: I could do all of that on my iPad screen.

In early 2026, we finally discovered that Apple wouldn’t phase out Pixelmator software, as it would continue to update the Photomator app. However, the company also surprised users by releasing an all-new iPad version of Pixelmator Pro as part of the Apple Creator Studio bundle, which offers nine apps for a single subscription.

While I think Pixelmator Pro is the best option for those who want a similar experience to that on the Mac, especially for editing photos, I think Photomator is a more interesting tool, as you can buy it once and focus on improving your photos with its easy-to-tap features.

Portal – Escape into Nature

José Adorno/BGR

If you’re having a long day at work, want to relax a bit, or really need to focus, Portal might be the best option for you. While the iPad app can’t replace your desktop background, as it can on the Mac, it takes advantage of the iPad Pro’s beautiful OLED display with breathtaking high-resolution images and Spatial Audio support.

Basically, you can choose between several cinematic and vivid landscapes to jump into. The idea behind this app is to connect users with nature, which helps them spark creativity, ease anxiety, and more. One of the best features introduced in 2025 is Circadian Flow, which synchronizes portals with your time zone, helping you experience different natural scenes and sounds based on the time of day. Usually, if I’m working on the Mac, I just use Portal there, but if I’m cooking, trying to relax, or even preparing to go to bed, Portal is a good way for me to just relax.

Even if you use your iPad to work instead of a Mac, you can still take advantage of the app by putting on your AirPods and just listening to the sound of nature while you work, study, or organize your thoughts. The app has a 7-day free trial and offers both a subscription and a lifetime pass. The subscription is $12.99/month or $69.99/year; the lifetime pass costs $299.99.

Paper – Sketch, Draw & Create

José Adorno/BGR

I’m far from being good at drawing. However, my very expensive iPad Pro pushes me to explore everything I can do with it, including sketching and drawing. Paper is the best app to do that. After all, it offers tools for sketching, collage, painting, and drawing. Usually, I like to add photos or other images and draw above them, so I can later delete the photo and see if I did it right.

The app also lets you add multiple photos on a single page, so you can create mood boards, storyboards, find inspiration, or just organize your ideas. Users can create different journals depending on what they want, so you can save a notebook for a moodboard, another for little drawings, another for work, and so on.

While the software is free to use, subscribing to its Pro tier unlocks unlimited journals, custom templates, canvas clips, new brush adjustments, iCloud sync, and other advanced tools. The app, of course, works better with an Apple Pencil, as you can take advantage of this accessory’s pressure sensor on the iPad display. Besides that, the big display of the iPad helps you better organize your thoughts, as you can zoom in to improve a very specific part of your drawing, or have a more outside look, as if you’re actually taking advantage of a physical notebook.

Ulysses: Writing App

José Adorno/BGR

Whether you’re a writer, aspire to become one, or you just like to share your thoughts every once in a while, Ulysses might be one of the most essential iPad apps. It’s also available for iPhone and Mac, but there’s something unique about using Apple’s Magic Keyboard attached to an iPad Pro when working on your next essay, novel, or story.

Ulysses offers a markup-based, distraction-free editor that focuses on what matters the most: your creative process. With that, you don’t need to stress about how pretty your text will look, as the most important part is putting your ideas out there. Ulysses lets you organize your text through projects, which you can split between different files. For example, I usually write my news stories on Ulysses, so I have a file of drafts and another one of published articles. It also lets me add links so I can back up my stories or mention other things I’ve written.

The app also flags wrong capitalization, punctuation, semantics, redundancy, and style. Users can create eBooks, DOCX, PDFs, and HTML files to export into different formats. Finally, it’s also possible to publish from Ulysses to WordPress, Ghost, Substack, and other platforms. The app is free to download but requires a subscription for users to take full advantage of the most minimalist, yet best writing app available for iPhone, iPad, and Mac.

How I picked apps for this list

José Adorno/BGR

Covering Apple for over a decade and owning several iPad models since I was a teenager, I have used hundreds of apps across the multiple tablets I’ve used. In selecting the apps for this list, we considered many other solutions that were helpful for a while but lacked that spark. These apps also represent a mix of popular apps from larger companies and indie developers, resulting in a well-regarded selection of iPad apps. 

Source

Samuel Boivin/Shutterstock

WhatsApp Plus is beginning to roll out for some iOS users in certain regions, following an Android beta that launched in April. Often, when a service adds a premium tier, previously free things, like hidden WhatsApp features everyone should use, may get locked behind a paywall. With over 3 billion monthly users, the messaging platform is among the most widely used for communications, especially outside of the United States, so those concerns are more than fair.

Fortunately, you really don’t need to get WhatsApp Plus. Even WhatsApp itself would tell you that, as its Help Center page refers to the subscription as “optional”. Its premium features are mostly cosmetic, while all of the important functions of WhatsApp, like calling and messaging, remain available to all users.

So far, WhatsApp Plus seems to only be available in Europe and costs €2.49, suggesting a price of around $2.99. While the rollout has started small so the company can get user feedback, it’s expected to expand to more accounts in the coming weeks. WhatsApp Plus will likely add new features once it’s widely available, but so far, there’s nothing that would really make WhatsApp Plus worth the money.

WhatsApp Plus adds one useful feature, but little else

Jacob Wackerhausen/Getty Images

WhatsApp Plus is launching with five features:

• Themes and app icons
• Up to 20 pinned chats (up from three )
• Premium ringtones you can set to specific contacts
• Chat list customization (alerts, ringtones, themes)
• Premium stickers with special effects

Of the five, four are strictly cosmetic. These extra personalization options are probably fun to mess around with, but things like ringtones and stickers don’t actually improve the service in any meaningful way. The only feature that actually impacts the app’s functionality is the increase in pinned chats, which is nice since three is pretty low, especially for anyone using WhatsApp as their primary form of communication.

That alone, though, is probably not enough to justify adding another subscription service to your monthly expenses. While it isn’t expensive, it’s also not particularly compelling. That’s good from a consumer standpoint, but it does make the service and its rollout kind of a nothingburger.

This isn’t the first time WhatsApp has introduced a subscription. From 2013 through 2016, WhatsApp was only free to use for the first year, charging $0.99/year after that. While it’s obviously not a massive fee, it impacted WhatsApp’s ability to expand and maintain users in the developing world, especially in places where even those with money lacked access to credit or debit cards. Removing that certainly helped the service expand to what it is today, though there are plenty of other great messaging apps for Android and iOS to check out if you’re unhappy with WhatsApp.

Source

LIAL/Shutterstock

If you walk into a store to buy a television these days, you’re most likely only going to find a flat-panel TV using OLED, LCD, QLED, and more. There are no more big CRT (Cathode Ray Tube) TVs to be bought, and surely we’ve all moved on from those beastly TVs of yore?

Well, not so fast. While CRT production for home TVs stopped in the U.S. around the mid-2000s, and most people no longer use them, there’s a strong community of CRT enthusiasts from all over the world who buy, preserve, and use these old TVs. The internet is filled with retro and AV enthusiast forums and groups that pore over listings looking for that holy grail CRT that’s been sealed in a box since the ’90s. Why?

As it turns out, while flat panel TVs surpass CRTs in many ways that matter for commercial success, CRTs are still better in a few key areas that almost guarantee that the typical videophile will want at least one of these lead and glass machines hanging around somewhere. If that sounds surprising, you’ll want to stick around to find out exactly what makes CRTs so good when used for the right reasons. Who knows? Perhaps by the end, you’ll be looking for your own back-breaking goggle-box.

They display classic games the way developers intended

Pressmaster/Getty Images

CRTs are popular among retro gaming enthusiasts because the games they want to play were developed with this older display technology in mind. The game developers would take advantage of the unique properties you get when you fire electron beams at phosphors, which means that playing these same games on a modern flat panel doesn’t look quite right.

A key example is how the combination of CRT image properties and the nature of analog video signals is used to create the illusion of a transparant waterfall in “Sonic the Hedgehog.” Using an emulator on a pixel-perfect flat-panel removes these clever tricks from their natural environment, and the game looks wrong or the intended effect is missing.

Likewise, many character sprites (the 2D images representing characters) look strangely misshapen and distorted on a flat panel. This doesn’t happen for sprites designed to be seen on flat-panel displays, since the artist creates them with these modern screens in mind. The natural pixel blending and unique pixel aspect ratio of CRTs mean that you need to view these older games on them to see what they are meant to look like. It’s not that CRTs can display pixel art inherently better than other display technologies; it’s that the artists created their imagery with the display technology of the day in mind, and for a certain era of gaming, that’s going to be a CRT.

Zero processing lag still beats even the best modern displays

Luza Studios/Getty Images

When you’re playing a video game, let’s say it’s “Super Mario Bros.” for the sake of argument, there’s a span of time between pressing a button on the controller and seeing the character respond to that on-screen. This is known as input latency, and it’s an important aspect of video games that doesn’t get enough attention compared to things like frame rate or image resolution.

There are many contributors to the total latency in the chain from input to output, but in modern digital flat panels, a significant amount of digital processing must happen from the moment the signal enters the display until you see changes on your TV. This processing is meant to boost picture quality, and usually it’s good to have, but not when you’re doing something latency-sensitive, like playing video games. This is why modern TVs have game and PC modes, which disable as many of these post-processing effects as possible. This leads to lower picture quality, but also reduces latency.

That said, even the snappiest modern digital displays ain’t got nothing on an analog CRT. From signal to display, the latency is so low that in human terms, it might as well be zero. This is why retro games feel so snappy on a CRT, and why you keep missing those tricky jumps on a flat-panel TV.

Native resolution? CRTs don’t need one

Kwangmoozaa/Getty Images

The biggest adjustment going from CRTs to plasma, LCD, or OLED TVs is the concept of native resolution. It’s not hard to understand, but we need to briefly unpack some concepts. On a modern flat panel, there’s a physical grid of pixels. So a 1080p TV has a grid consisting of 1920×1080 pixels. If you put an image on that screen with exactly that number of pixels in that ratio, you get a perfect recreation of the image.

On Blu-ray, that’s what you’re getting, but DVD media has a fraction of the pixels. So what now? That’s what “upscaling” means on a smart TV. It’s a mathematical operation that determines how to handle all those extra pixels when there’s no information in the original image to fill the gaps. One form of upscaling is integer scaling. This only works if your lower-resolution image can be divided perfectly into the pixel grid. 1080p scales perfectly into 4K UHD by having four pixels represent one. It’s a softer image, but everything else looks right.

That’s not what happens when you end up with fractions of pixels, and various methods try to estimate what those fractional pixels should look like. The result is ugly artifacting, though scaling technology has become pretty decent. But, CRTs don’t have pixel grids. They draw the image on the back of a glass surface, no scaling required! That makes them ideal for retro video games and video content.

CRT motion clarity is still unmatched

Belen Sanma/Shutterstock

Apart from the tyranny of native resolution, the other shocking downgrade going from CRT TVs and monitors to LCDs was how horribly blurry these new flat panels are. A lot of it was down to ghosting, which happened because the LCD’s pixels couldn’t change state fast enough to keep up with the image on screen. This led to smeary ghost-like afterimages.

But modern flat panels have pixel response times as low as a single millisecond. They have high refresh rates, too, and yet these displays have blurry, smeary motion. Why? It turns out the problem is really with us and how our eyes and brain work. These modern screens are sample-and-hold displays. This means the screen holds a frame of video perfectly, and then the whole screen snaps to the next frame. This sounds like a good thing, but CRTs have a blanking period between frames as the phosphors decay, and it turns out this prevents us from perceiving movement on-screen as smearing across our retinas.

Flat panel makers have come up with technologies like motion interpolation, black frame insertion, and backlight strobing to try to achieve what CRTs can do naturally. The most expensive TVs and monitors with the latest backlight strobing technology do a pretty good job, but when you can pick up a used CRT for less than $30 and see perfect motion, it’s clear why so many people opt for the old tubes instead.

Deep blacks and contrast come naturally to CRTs

O Kemppainen/Getty Images

There was yet another thing those who lived through the great flatscreen revolution noticed when sitting down in front of their stylish new thin TVs. For some reason, the image looked so much more washed out than on CRTs. Bright full-frame images looked great, but any scene with darkness in it looked muddy.

This all comes down to emissive versus transmissive displays. A CRT emits its own light. So when something is dark or completely black, that part of the image is simply turned off. In an LCD, the display does not generate its own light. Instead, you need to shine a backlight through it to see anything. A black pixel is one that blocks all light from the backlight. Except, you can never perfectly block a backlight, so instead of black, you get a washed-out grey.

Using emissive screen technology, OLEDs do not have this problem, but they’re still more expensive than LCDs. LCD technology has advanced with backlight dimming zones, mini-LEDs, and new micro RGB displays. With these backlight systems, the backlight can be dimmed or turned off selectively, but CRTs are still among the cheapest ways to achieve perfect blacks, if you can find a good one. Some CRTs have a grey cast to the screen when turned off, and so the black isn’t quite perfect, but still far better than a typical LCD.

Modern alternatives still struggle to replicate the experience

Yuganov Konstantin/Shutterstock

If CRTs are so much better than LCDs in so many ways, and even better than expensive OLEDs in some cases, why did they fall out of favor? There are a few likely reasons. Convenience is a big one. CRTs are bulky and extremely heavy. Scaling up the screen size also increases the bulk rapidly. The largest CRT TV ever manufactured is the Sony PVM-4300, and it weighs in at a staggering 440 pounds! That’s for a 43″ screen, which is absolutely pedestrian by modern standards.

HD CRTs existed near the end of their reign, but the higher resolution only made sense at bigger screen sizes. So even with worse color, contrast, and motion, people seemed happy to switch to thin, light, space-saving TVs. The result is that TV engineers have spent literal decades trying to mimic a fraction of the power of CRT technology. We mentioned black frame insertion earlier, and you’ve surely seen that awful motion smoothing on your smart TV, but as of this writing, emergent technologies like NVIDIA’s G-SYNC Pulsar and GPU-powered CRT scanline simulation are the closest anyone has come to matching CRTs with flat-panel displays.

DLSS on an NVIDIA graphics card uses powerful AI hardware to produce satisfying upscaling results that CRTs can achieve with no computation or special effort. If you have the money and access to the latest tech, you can have something almost as good as the TV you picked up for free from the sidewalk!

They’ve become rare, and that makes them desirable

Huseyin Asliyuce/Getty Images

Once the praises of CRTs had been sung, there was no way to unring that bell. People still want them,  but there is no new supply of CRTs. Every time one breaks, or two are combined to make one working model, the number of CRTs goes down. It’s a resilient technology, and with good maintenance, many will keep working for years to come, but unless by some miracle someone decides to start a new CRT factory, what we have at any given moment is it.

This creates a sort of “Concorde moment” where, knowing that something is going away forever, people want to get it while they can. As a result, used CRT prices have gone up significantly. Resellers are the bane of CRT enthusiast groups on sites like Facebook, where people snap up cheap used CRTs from sellers who don’t know about the demand, and then list them immediately with a huge markup. In particular, be wary of listings that say things like “retro gaming TV” or “rare retro TV.” That’s a sign the seller knows what’s up.

At some point, probably in the near future, modern display technology will likely catch up and surpass CRTs in every way. However, even after decades of development, they still haven’t quite done it. Which means that CRTs will remain a hot item among a certain subset of authenticity- and performance-obsessed enthusiasts.

Source

Prime Video / Static Media

One of the toughest contenders to knock Netflix off the top spot among the best streaming services out there is Amazon Prime Video. It has conjured some pretty beloved shows that scooped audiences by the millions while costing around the same amount to make. With the likes of “The Rings of Power” and “Fallout” drawing in viewers by the bucketload, and even one-man neck-snapper “Reacher” getting plenty of attention, there’s clearly a lot to be had over on Prime Video. But just like every other streaming service at your disposal, there are also those truly top-level golden nuggets that, before you know it, will have you binging through to the finale.

From mainstream hits to cult comedy gut-busters, we’ve gathered together a good pile of programming that can help you pass the time, and if you’re lucky, might just become brand-new favorites that are worth going back to. If you want to laugh, cry, and be terrified of milk-obsessed madmen, we absolutely have you covered. To start things off, we’re going to one of the heaviest hitters that Prime Video has ever swung with, and it’s frankly a shame that it’ll soon be coming to an end.

The Boys

Prime VIdeo

When the world was caught up in a severe swirl of superhero stories, Prime Video gave us what might go down as one of the greatest comic book adaptations ever put on television. “Supernatural” showrunner Eric Kripke, along with producers Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, brought the world of “The Boys” to life in gory and often hilariously offensive fashion. Based on the comic book series of the same name by Garth Ennis, Karl Urban leads the titular team, who make it their mission to expose the world of supes and their sordid activities hidden from the public eye. Standing or occasionally hovering in their way is Antony Starr’s Homelander, an unhinged Superman sort with a god complex who is the scene-stealing villain of the show.

Often keeping its thumb on the pulse of current affairs with alarming accuracy, “The Boys” is an off-the-rails saga about absolute power corrupting absolutely, doing so through some truly heinous and jaw-dropping set pieces that often end in a pile of mulch in a world where heroes are hard to come by. Although there might be a series of spin-offs branching off from this world of F-bomb-dropping bad guys, it’s the flagship story that is undoubtedly Prime Video’s best bit of work and won’t be topped anytime soon.

Fleabag

Prime Video

The show that put Phoebe Waller-Bridge on the map remains one of the greatest comedy series on all of Amazon Prime. Adapted from the stage play of the same name, “Fleabag” follows a nameless singleton as she tries to navigate the pressures of London life and the demands of her family. This treacherous story of bedroom bumbling and awkward family get-togethers is a showcase of Waller-Bridge’s remarkable writing style, as she breaks the fourth wall and journeys from grieving over her late friend to an encounter with a man who’s as complicated as she is.

Adding to the ferociously funny world are Olivia Colman, Fiona Shaw, Jamie Demetriou, and Kristen Scott Thomas. The real highlight, though, is the chemistry between Bridge and Andrew Scott’s simply named Hot Priest, which is one for the record books. The latter breaks through her barrier and puts a stop to her often comical bouts of casual hookups and drinking. What follows is a bittersweet romance story that hits like a gut punch. If you somehow haven’t seen “Fleabag” and are worried you won’t have time, don’t fret. The two seasons in this show are composed of 30-minute episodes, and you won’t know what to do with yourself once they’re done. Don’t worry, though, it’ll pass.

Jack Ryan

Prime Video

Plenty of A-listers have tried to take on the role of Jack Ryan, with Harrison Ford previously being the only one who did more than one term as Tom Clancy’s political hero. Finally, in 2018, “The Office” star John Krasinski stepped into the shoes of the CIA analyst and carried the role for four incredible seasons. Prior to his work on Prime’s “Jack Ryan,” Krasinski had taken on an action-focused role in “13 Hours” and directed and starred in “A Quiet Place.” Here, he does an effortless job meeting all the demands of this legendary literary hero role, but he’s backed by some decent talent as well.

Any spy-like hero deserves some assistance in the field, and Krasinski’s Ryan is helped on his world-saving missions by “The Wire’s” Wendell Pierce as James Greer and Michael Kelly as the consistently welcome Mike November, who feels like the Felix Leiter to Ryan’s Bond. Even on his own, though, Krasinski has enough charm and charisma to have earned the status of being the best Jack Ryan we’ve ever had. Once you’re done with the four consistently brilliant seasons, you’ll be rewarded with a new feature-length film: “Jack Ryan: Ghost War” is heading to Prime Video on May 20, 2026.

Catastrophe

Prime Video

“Fleabag” isn’t the only comedy from across the pond that’s worth lining up on Prime Video. Not earning quite as much attention as “Fleabag” (but then, what else could, really?), “Catastrophe” was a sitcom penned by “Bad Sisters” scribe Sharon Horgan and “Deadpool’s” Rob Delaney, who both play the lead roles in the Emmy-nominated series. Delaney plays Rob, an American ad exec who bumps into Horgan’s Sharon on a night out in London. One drink leads to another, and before they know it, a hangover from hell sees Sharon become pregnant and the two turning their lives upside down for the good of the unexpected family they’re about to become a part of.

With supporting talent composed of Ashley Jensen (“Extras”) along with the late, great Carrie Fisher playing Rob’s mother, Mia, this really is a forgotten laugh factory of a show that displays with blistering honesty the complications that can come with love and relationships. Despite debuting over a decade ago, there are some pressure points that Horgan and Delaney’s writing tackles in “Catastrophe” that still hold up today. Much like “Fleabag,” this brilliantly funny love story is short and sweet. Spanning a mere four seasons at six episodes each, it’s easy to get through — and once you’re done, you’ll be recommending to friends another classic that not nearly enough people have seen.

Mr. and Mrs. Smith

Prime Video

Rarely are remakes better than the original movie. Thankfully, in the case of “Mr. and Mrs. Smith,” the Prime Video show feels like one that stands on its own — something totally separate from the Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie action rom-com — and comes off better for it. Starring Donald Glover and Maya Erskine (“Blue Eye Samurai”), the series follows a pair of young secret agents who are forced to pose as a married couple for a mysterious organization. Understandably, the fake Mr. and Mrs. are wary of each other until feelings start to grow and they become a legitimate couple. The problem with that is that it sparks all the usual trappings of a relationship, interspersed with highly dangerous covert operations.

Glover and Erskine are a ridiculously cool pair of assassins who get the hots for one another and cross paths with a host of incredible cameos in every episode. Alexander Skarsgård, Sarah Paulson, Paul Dano, and Glover’s own mother, Beverly, are just some of the appearances that drop through the action-packed and super-witty show that ends in an emotionally charged finale. Prime Video has already confirmed that an all-new Mr. and Mrs. Smith will be taking on a mission in a new season. Do some recon and see how good the first ones are right away.

Source

Raditya/Getty Images

Unlike a traditional watch that gives you a static look, your Apple Watch allows you to change its look to fit your aesthetic. This is all thanks to watch faces, which are user interfaces that allow you to customize the look of your Apple Watch. Apple provides a variety of watch faces that are ready to use, and the company allows you to spruce up most of them depending on your needs. But in addition to that, there are other cool watch face apps that you can download on your Apple Watch to take things a notch higher. Now, on top of the various options from third-party developers and Apple’s own watch faces, the American tech company has just released a new software update that you can install on your watch right now to enjoy a brand-new face. 

The new watch face, called Pride Luminance, is available once you install Apple’s watchOS 26.5 update. It’s the latest watch face after Apple added four new faces with the introduction of watchOS 26. The Pride Luminance watch face comes in radial and vertical styles, with unmistakable Pride colors. Additionally, you can customize the watch face further with more colors. In a blog post, Apple said that the new watch face is part of the company’s efforts to “celebrate LGBTQ+ communities around the world during Pride Month and beyond.” To update your Apple Watch to watchOS 26.5, start by connecting it to Wi-Fi, then open the Settings app. After that, select General > Software Update and install the update.

Apple launches new Pride collection in celebration of Pride Month

As usual, Apple celebrates Pride Month in several ways. This year, the company is celebrating LGBTQ+ communities by launching a new Pride collection. A new watch face is always on the menu, and Apple didn’t miss that part for this year’s edition. In addition to that, the company also launched a new Apple Watch Pride Edition Sport Loop that the firm says is “woven from a rainbow of 11 colors of nylon yarns.” The band is available in several sizes, including 40 mm, 42 mm, and 46 mm, which means it’s compatible with a variety of Apple Watch models. 

The Pride Edition Sport Loop is part of the company’s collection to celebrate the season and is already available for sale on its website for $49. The watch face complements the new Pride Edition Sport Loop, and Apple has also launched a matching wallpaper on the iPhone and iPad as part of the collection. However, you’ll have to update your iPhone and iPad to iOS 26.5 and iPadOS 26.5, respectively, to get the new wallpaper.

Source

When we think of zippers, we think of a 2D structure that allows users to fasten two parts of a garment. Pulling a slider up and down between two rows of teeth that face each other allows the zipper to close and open smoothly. Applying the same concept to a fastening device that has three sides would result in a 3D zipper that can be used to quickly close or open structures that could benefit from such a mechanism. Such a device is called a “Y-zipper,” and it existed only as a concept until recently. Demonstrated and patented over 40 years ago, the original Y-zipper wasn’t easy to manufacture. But present-day 3D printing technology allowed the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) researchers to bring it back to life and turn the Y-zipper concept into a product that could one day be manufactured at scale for specific scenarios.

According to MIT News, William Freeman was an electrical engineer at Polaroid in 1985 when he entered a competition from the Innovative Design Fund. The prize was $10,000 for inventions related to clothing and textiles. The judges rejected Freeman’s proposal, but the engineer kept the difficult-to-manufacture prototype and patented the invention. More than 40 years later, Freeman is an MIT professor, and other MIT engineers developed a simpler method to manufacture his three-sided zipper using 3D printing technology.

Jiaji Li, the MIT CSAIL researcher and lead author on the modern Y-zipper version, and his team developed the software that allows 3D printers to create the components of the 3D zipper that can be connected precisely with the help of a 3D slider. The resulting three-sided zipper becomes an object that changes rigidity as the actuator moves.

What can the Y-zipper do?

When not in use, the Y-zipper looks like a squid, according to MIT. Its three arms can be compared to tentacles. They’re flexible and loose, as each side provides little stiffness on its own. But when the actuator moves up to close the three-sided zipper, the teeth on the three sides interlock, creating a stiff structure. The software allows the 3D printer to create Y-zippers in different shapes, depending on their purpose.

The scientists demonstrated concepts that allow the Y-zipper to form a rigid vertical rod that can be used as a leg in a robot that has to navigate complex terrain. A concept robot featuring four Y-zipper legs was able to reduce its height to pass under obstacles, or increase it to step over rocks on the ground. A different concept proposed a medical device meant to provide support to a broken wrist. In this scenario, one of the three parts of the Y-zipper was 3D printed into a wrist sleeve, allowing it to stay flexible to support wrist movement during the day. At night, the user would connect the other two parts of the Y-zipper with the help of a slider, turning the sleeve into a rigid support that kept the healing wrist protected.

A third concept showed a Y-zipper structure added to a tent. A user needed just 80 seconds to assemble a simple tent instead of the usual six minutes. Adding four motorized actuators to the four Y-zippers could reduce the assembly time to under 60 seconds. Finally, the researchers also showed the potential of using Y-zippers for art installations that require items to change shape or rigidity, as seen in the flower experiment in the video above.

What about durability?

The 2D zippers found on clothes are relatively durable, though they can become damaged over time and need replacing. For 3D printed Y-zippers, durability may be even more important. For example, the flexible Y-zipper legs of a robot that may be used in exploratory or search-and-rescue missions need to be durable enough so the robot can cover large distances reliably. The MIT researchers experimented with two types of plastics used in 3D printing: polylactic acid (PLA) and thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The former was better for heavier loads, while the latter was more pliable. They also ran an experiment where an actuator opened and closed continuously to test the durability of the device. After 18,000 cycles, the Y-zipper broke.

These tests suggest that 3D printed plastic Y-zippers may be suitable for specific uses, like adding rigidity to a medical wrist sleeve. But other uses may require more durable materials to prevent the three-sided zippers from malfunctioning and losing their rigidity. The MIT researchers see metal as a potential material for Y-zippers, though it’s unclear how a metal model would be designed. 3D printing is the key technology for manufacturing the Y-zipper components, as the software ensures the three zipper components match the geometry and fit down to the millimeter and that the teeth fit precisely when the slider moves.

The perfect fit also depends on a factor the scientists would not be able to control: the environment. The researchers envisioned aerospace use for three-sided zippers, which could be used as tentacles to grab objects near a spacecraft. In such a scenario, debris could be a problem, as it may impact the zipping and unzipping processes.

Source

Tada Images/Shutterstock

Streaming subscriptions continue to get expensive, with the likes of Netflix, HBO Max, Apple TV+, and AMC+ announcing a price hike over the last several months. This, combined with the fragmentation of content availability, can quickly make it costly to get a steady flow of good content to watch in your free time. This means you can either switch to free streaming services and watch whatever you get on them, or opt for something like Kanopy, which leverages your local library subscription to give you a cheap subscription alternative. Notably, there is a third option, which involves carefully choosing a selection of streaming services and their plans to pick the most affordable options that suit your needs.

While many major streaming services have crossed the $10 threshold for their monthly subscriptions, you can still find some notable options under $10, albeit with some caveats. Specific plans from popular streaming services like Netflix, Peacock, and Paramount+ can help you save a decent chunk of change if the recent price hikes are impacting your budget.

Netflix (Standard with ads)

Wachiwit/Getty Images

Although Netflix announces a subscription price increase almost every year, the streaming giant has managed to offer at least one of its plans for under $10. This plan is ideal for folks who want access to Netflix’s massive content portfolio, including the originals, but don’t want to shell out a ton in monthly subscription fees. As the name suggests, the Standard with ads plan includes advertisements, something that you’ll have to deal with to get Netflix this cheap. Keep in mind that a small selection of titles may not be available as part of this plan due to licensing restrictions.

The plan also limits content resolution to 1080p, which isn’t super bad and allows you to stream on up to two devices simultaneously. More importantly, you can install and sign into Netflix on as many devices as you want, and the simultaneous device restriction will only come into effect when you actually start to stream something. You can also make up to five profiles to ensure different household members can maintain their separate watch history and recommendations. The Netflix Standard with Ads plan costs $9 a month.

Paramount+ (Essential)

Blossom Stock Studio/Shutterstock

Paramount+ is one of the more affordable premium streaming services, with its ad-supported “Essential” plan costing only $9 a month. You can save further by opting for the annual plan at $90. This plan gives you access to over 40,000 movies and TV shows, including popular originals like “Dutton Ranch,” “The Madison,” “Landman,” and episodes of several Showtime originals. Additionally, you get movies like “Mission: Impossible — The Final Reckoning,” “Sonic 3,” and “The Running Man.” Some of its movie content comes via its deal with MGM+. You can also watch full episodes of many CBS, BET, Comedy Central, MTV, and Nickelodeon shows. Moreover, you can stream the NFL, UEFA Champions League, and live UFC fights.

The Paramount+ Essential plan allows streaming the service on up to three devices simultaneously, and the streaming resolution varies by content, with the maximum being 1080p for select content. The downside of this plan is that you miss out on higher-resolution streaming, the ability to download movies and TV shows for offline viewing, and live streaming of CBS and some of the sports content.

Peacock (Select)

Samuel Boivin/Shutterstock

Although Peacock is quickly becoming pricier, it has a “Select” plan that you can get for just $8 a month or $80 annually. However, this is a pretty restricted plan that’s not only ad-supported but also limits the content catalog to TV shows from NBC, Bravo, and more. Fortunately, the TV show selection has several popular titles, including but not limited to “Yellowstone,” “Law & Order,” and “The Office.”  Episodes of the TV series currently airing on NBC also appear the next day for Peacock Select subscribers.

Unfortunately, you miss out completely on movies, Peacock Originals, sports, live events, and your local NBC affiliate. Therefore, the Select tier only really makes sense for folks who primarily watch TV content or are fans of legacy NBC shows. Peacock, which is one of the top 10 streaming services, says the Select plan is currently being tested, making it unclear whether it’ll remain a permanent fixture of the service.

Source

Art-Dolgov/Shutterstock

Apple released the M2 MacBook Air in June 2022. Four years and three generations later, it continues to be a great purchase in 2026. While the MacBook Neo makes it hard to recommend the M1 MacBook Air, the story is completely different for the M2 MacBook Air, as its extra features and more powerful processor make it relevant today.

This Air laptop introduced a complete redesign, following the same industrial look of the 2021 MacBook Pro, while also getting a display, webcam, and processor improvement. With a 13.6-inch display, Apple promises up to 15 hours of wireless web on the M2 MacBook Air. The laptop features two Thunderbolt USB-C ports, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and the most important upgrade compared to the previous generation: a MagSafe port, which helps you to not drop your Mac on the floor if you stumble over the cable. Originally available with 8GB of RAM, this MacBook can be found in the second-hand market with up to 24GB of RAM and up to 2TB of storage. It supports Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, and a 1080p FaceTime HD camera, which is great for taking video calls. It can connect to an external display with up to 6K and 60Hz resolution. Aside from all that, here’s why the M2 MacBook Air is still a solid option in 2026, and for whom it can be a perfect match.

Light work for years to come

Rezeki2031/Shutterstock

Since the MacBook Neo processor is comparable with the M2 chip available on the MacBook Air, it’s safe to assume that this laptop will continue to get support for at least another four years. While it’s still guesswork, as Apple hasn’t started to discontinue its Apple Silicon Macs in favor of newer models, we can expect that the M1 Macs will last for at least seven years. MacOS 27 will drop support for Intel Macs, not for the first Apple Silicon Mac released in late 2020. So, the M1 model will still get updates at least until late 2027, when the next macOS major update is expected.

This long support is impressive, especially because these computers are still great for web browsing and light activities like video calls, photo editing and paperwork. The recently-released MacBook Neo, which serves the same purposes, offers a new, yet not as powerful processor as the M5 chip on newer, more powerful MacBooks. So, it’s unlikely that Apple just released this laptop to drop support in just a couple of years.

Still, when considering the M2 MacBook Air’s design and other functionalities, like the MagSafe port, the better webcam, display, and SSD, the M2 it gets a lot more enticing. Besides that, a refurbished model is in the same price range as the MacBook Neo, from $499 to $599, depending on whether customers have a student discount.

Here’s when you should update to a more capable MacBook

José Adorno/BGR

If you just want a lightweight, fast, and useful laptop, the M2 MacBook Air continues to be a solid option in 2026. Choosing a recent model, like one with the M4 chip or a M5 MacBook Air, is only worth it if you want the latest laptop with improved internal specs, like more RAM, storage, and support for more external displays. Likewise, if you’re planning to run really complex local AI tasks, do heavy photo and video editing, or need a lot of GPU power to work on 3D graphics, making the jump to a MacBook Pro could be worth it, especially due to the cooling fans that guarantee performance stability. Besides that, a MacBook Pro gives you more internal spec upgrades, a better display, and more ports.

However, if you’re looking for a laptop for college, to run several spreadsheets, do general light work, or just a computer to save all your files in a single place, the M2 MacBook Air will continue to be a solid option for years. The worst that could happen is Apple starting to release new Apple Intelligence features only for laptops with more RAM, such as those with a minimum of 16GB, for example. Besides that, there’s no indicator that the first few generations of Apple Silicon Macs will start to slow down or stop getting support for the latest macOS updates.

Source

We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

In 2025, Amazon announced plans to release a more budget-friendly version of its large e-reader / notebook tablet, the Kindle Scribe. Now, almost a year later, we finally know when the Kindle Scribe Without Front Light will arrive, as well as what it will cost. The new version of the Scribe will include an 11-inch display, just like the original version, and it will retail starting at $429.99 — $70 cheaper than the $499.99 Kindle Scribe with a front light.

While $70 is a significant discount, consumers looking to pick up the cheaper variant need to decide if the biggest catch is worth the money saved, as the lack of a front light on the cheaper Kindle Scribe means you’ll be more limited on where and when you can use the Scribe, especially if you plan to do a lot of reading on it. Without a front light, reading or writing in dark environments will more difficult. 

Aside from the missing front light, nearly everything else about the cheaper Kindle Scribe is the same as the original, though it does appear to max out at 16GB or storage, where the pricier model comes with 32GB or 64GB. That is a bit disappointing, especially if you plan to use it to take a lot of notes. However, it should still be more than enough storage for most users.

A solid deal for Kindle fans

The lack of a front light on the new Kindle Scribe model might be disappointing to some, and it certainly seems like a big trade-off on paper. However, the device does fit in with similar Kindle alternatives in terms of the features that it offers. Other popular options in this niche, like the reMarkable Paper Pure, offer similar functionality and features for around the same price.

Beyond the missing front light, the cheapest Kindle Scribe will still get you access to the Scribe’s paper-like feel, as well as the built-in AI notebooks that it offers. Additionally, when Amazon launches new AI-powered Kindle features like “Story So Far” — which is a way to recap stories before you jump into another — the new Kindle Scribe Without Front Light can access them and other features Amazon has added to the Scribe. If you prefer Amazon’s ecosystem and want to save $70, then the new Kindle Scribe without a front light is still a solid option, especially if you’re looking to upgrade to a new device in light of the news that Amazon is ending support for older Kindles.

Source