Posted on

Balancing act: Managing business needs alongside digital transformation and innovation

When building a startup, there is a real balancing act between managing expectations, educating on what’s possible, and identifying the true cost of innovation. CTOs are challenged not only to build functional technology platforms quickly, but to do so as cost effectively as possible.

Startups are often not profitable therefore don’t have a lot of cash to burn, meaning the CTO has to deliver technology solutions to solve their business goals on a limited budget.

Let’s look at a legacy industry like commercial insurance – it’s been undergoing a transformation in recent years. The industry is data and human heavy and is heavily regulated which is why it’s ripe for innovation. It is also playing catch-up to address the needs of many consumers who want a seamless user experience and businesses that want a modern experience – faster, streamlined, digitised, and so on – when dealing with insurance providers. This is particularly true of the on-demand economy.

Leveraging technology

The on-demand economy is characterised by the likes of Taskrabbit, Doordash, Uber, Deliveroo and Amazon Flex. But it’s the likes of hard working on-demand taxi and delivery drivers who are calling for flexible insurance that caters to their very specific needs which enables them to buy comprehensive coverage for when they’re driving, and to switch it off when they’re not.

However, many insurtechs have not adequately met these needs despite their ability to leverage technology more nimbly and effectively than traditional players. The business of insurance is complicated and innovation cannot be retrofitted with existing tech, which is why it’s vital to have a deep understanding of what the requirements are between the customer, the insurance partners and platforms like Uber and Amazon, for instance.

Transforming the on-demand insurance industry is a symbiotic relationship between the customer, the insurance provider and the platform. Although it can deliver real results for all, it also comes with its share of unique challenges.

Loss ratio – how much an insurance company spends on claims compared to the premiums it receives – is a key indicator of profitability. When insurtech startups focus too much on showy AI-driven gimmicks such as automatic claims payments within seconds, loss ratios suffer – and crucial insurance industry partners back away quickly. In the world of insurance, “innovation at all costs” simply doesn’t work.

But technology cannot simply operate as a cost centre. By working in partnership with the rest of the business, startup CTOs and their teams need to focus on building an ongoing technology foundation to drive innovation within legacy industry structures and processes, driving business growth as well as consistent results for customers and partners.

Tech as augmentor – not replacement

Many of the challenges CTOs face aren’t necessarily about technology, but the change of mindset required when implementing tech solutions. Until very recently, insurance was an industry dominated by traditional players, governed by outdated systems and processes. While this is changing, there are still areas where bridges must be built between the promise of what technology can deliver and a certain “this is how it’s always been done” mindset.

For example, we know that insurance, like many industries, is ripe for reinvention through smart uses of AI – as long as it is implemented in the most appropriate areas of the business, and used as an augmented assistant rather than a replacement for specialist expertise.

Chris Gray headshot

“Many of the challenges CTOs face aren’t necessarily about technology, but the change of mindset required when implementing tech solutions”

Chris Gray, Inshur

At Inshur, working in combination with a team from Google Cloud, we were able to build an AI assistant for our claims team and demonstrate to management its effectiveness in helping the team prioritise work as well as speeding up administrative tasks, while providing fast and effective customer service. We’re continuing to roll out this technology internationally, as well as add further features to augment the human adjusters and utilise their expertise while saving them time.

The assistant helps the team to quickly scan incoming documents, including email, physical letters, attachments or transcribed phone calls; infer the data, including who is the sender and the intention of the communication; identify important and useful information such as vehicle registration and claimant name; identify the priority and urgency of the claim; assign it to the right team; and summarise the data into a standard format for ease of use. By automatically accepting feedback, retraining, and learning from past actions, the assistant also helps guide handlers with proposed next steps, helping to train new claims handlers.

The AI-based tools we built to support our claims teams have enabled us to see patterns that are also a good fit for other departments within the business. So much so, that we see potential for the commoditisation of these approaches to a wider set of solutions that serves not just insurance, but any business.

Build or buy?

Another question a lot of startup CTOs are asked is whether to build or buy. Building tech solutions from scratch can carry significant risk, especially given the resource investment typically required. But when every business in a given market is using the same platforms – usually with significant tweaks and workarounds to fit their specific needs – then nobody can truly win the innovation race.

First-movers must always be willing to build when necessary, and to buy when prudent.

For example, we decided that we needed to invest in developing our own solutions to problems that could not be adequately solved by off-the-shelf products. One such product is our Pay-as-you-flex wallet for Amazon Flex. While traditional insurance has historically covered drivers at all times, including when they’re not driving, we knew that technology held the key to delivering a new insurance product that would enable delivery drivers to pay only for the cover they needed, when they needed it.

As the first-of-its-kind to enter the market, we knew that we’d need to build it from scratch.

It’s only since we built our proprietary platform to manage business-critical processes including policy administration, claims management and billing that similar products have entered the market. By building a platform that’s fully tailored to the specific needs of the market we serve, we’ve paved the way for other insurers to do the same for their customers and partners.

However, the startup CTO must also take the lead in conversations where buying makes most sense, securing buy-in from other senior stakeholders and identifying the most appropriate vendors to partner with. Often, particularly in a high-growth startup where cost and return on investment are key considerations, this will involve a detailed assessment of risk for all available scenarios.

In Inshur’s case, we’re working with Google Cloud to implement several of its AI products to drive efficiencies and ensure that customers are treated fairly – which is both a regulatory and moral imperative in the insurance industry.

We know that our customers drive for a living, which means they often need to call us via their hands-free mobile technology while driving in between journeys, rather than emailing or speaking to a text-based chatbot. 

When we identified that a significant proportion of the calls coming into our customer service team could be quickly and effectively answered by an AI-driven solution, we implemented a “smart virtual agent” to handle more straightforward queries, enabling the team to focus more on serving customers with specific or detailed questions.

Bridging the gap

Because of the crucial role technology such as AI will play in the coming years, CTOs will need to ensure they are consistently developing deep understanding and expertise, not just in the latest technology innovations but also how they can be implemented to drive business strategy and growth.

Crucially, this will include taking a leadership role in helping to educate stakeholders across the business on the best use cases for AI tools and other solutions, building understanding at every level around what the technology can and can’t help with, and putting clear structure and process around innovation.

This ability to bridge the gap between the business and technology is already becoming a crucial indicator of future success.

Chris Gray is chief technology officer at vehicle insurance provider Inshur.

Source

Posted on

Nordic innovators drive the evolution of engagement

Consumers around the world are no longer strangers to digital, interactive experiences in their daily lives. However, the extent and depth of interaction is being taken to new levels thanks to a Nordic contingent that is leaning on the perfect set of cultural conditions to accelerate the evolution of engagement. 

No sectors, subsectors or even casual past-times are off limits to a region that has a knack for driving innovation into the most niche of spaces. In some cases, the result is a reinvention of practices that are centuries old – from overhauling traditional education, to a simple game of chess, or learning a musical instrument. 

No matter how traditional, how typically face-to-face, or how unlikely to succumb to digital disruption, there are Nordic startups identifying the potential for greater accessibility elevated through digital engagement. 

There is an ecosystem willing to support such blue sky thinking, a penchant for rethinking the traditional, and – perhaps most important of all – a skill of tailoring advanced tech to the basic needs and wants of modern life. 

An Uber for online music lessons 

It is this latter cultural differentiator that Margrét Juliana Sigurdardottir sees as the key reason for the success of Moombix– an interactive solution making music education more accessible to adults around the world. 

The company is the Icelandic entrepreneur’s second tech startup, describing it as: “An Uber for online music lessons – a comprehensive platform and marketplace connecting adult students with expert teachers worldwide for live, online and real-time learning, at their own pace, according to their schedules, and from the comfort of their homes.”

In October 2024, Moombix reached a significant milestone by securing £1.9m in seed funding – the latest, exciting stage of a journey that Sigurdardottir believes is indicative of Nordic tech’s relationship with consumer engagement. 

“Moombix’s journey reflects a broader trend within Nordic tech,” says Sigurdardottir. “We’re not just adapting traditional services for digital, but reimagining them in ways that meet modern lifestyle needs and integrate seamlessly with daily life. Through Moombix, we hope to inspire more people to see music education as an accessible, enriching part of life – one that technology has the power to democratise and bring to all.” 

Sigurdardottir notes that there is a genuine need for lifestyle-oriented learning, alluding to this ability among Nordic tech startups to tap into the daily needs of consumers. 

“The demand for interactive digital experiences is greater than ever, and Moombix taps directly into this trend,” she adds. “As people’s lives become more digital, they want their online interactions to feel as engaging and personalised as in-person experiences. We’re witnessing a shift in consumer preferences toward platforms that offer flexibility and cater to self-improvement – whether for health, time management or simply personal growth. 

“For Moombix, our ability to build a community around shared interests and passions has been a defining factor in our success.” 

Innovating the physical and analogue 

The Nordic startup ecosystem has become a global leader in transforming traditional industries such as musical instrument teaching, but there are some targeted spaces that seem even less naturally suited to digital disruption – Norwegian company, Take Take Take, for example. 

“It’s chess,” says Mats André Kristiansen, the company’s CEO and co-founder who already has unicorn, Oda, Northern Europe’s largest online grocery company, in his portfolio.

“Take Take Take is an innovative platform I co-founded with world-renowned chess champion, Magnus Carlsen. Launched in October this year, the app is designed to revolutionise how fans experience chess. Digital transformation is reshaping every sector, and the Nordics have been at the forefront of leading this charge.” 

So, why not chess? 

“Exactly,” Kristiansen says. “Take Take Take targets the millions of casual chess enthusiasts globally, providing a completely new, interactive and engaging way to watch and follow matches. Our goal is to make the game more accessible and engaging through an entertaining and spectator-friendly format.”

The app provides an immersive experience for all levels of chess players, offering features such as real-time match commentary, player evaluations, a Fantasy Chess feature and personalised content based on user preferences. 

It’s difficult to imagine how a 1,500 year-old game would be ripe for heightened digital engagement, but Kristiansen notes that it comes from a Nordic startup strength to innovate the “very physical or analogue”.  

“We have a knack for integrating technology to enhance experiences and create new ways of interacting with longstanding traditions,” he adds. “Nordic founders also tend to have a strong ability to spot emerging cultural trends and capitalise on them early. There’s a deep understanding of how the world is changing and how people’s needs and desires are evolving. This anticipatory mindset allows us to create solutions that resonate emotionally with customers.” 

Governmental backing and a problem-solving culture

It’s a blend of creativity and pragmatism that also aligns with the wider ecosystem. For any startup to scale, there needs to be support, and the Nordics are world leaders in terms of generating that much needed buy-in regionally so they can take their solutions to market globally. 

“I believe that Nordic companies are leading the way in digital innovation as they are driven by a unique and robust regional ecosystem that nurtures creativity and technological progress,” says Sean D’Arcy, chief of solutions at Kahoot!, another Norwegian company founded in 2012, gamifying learning across traditional institutions (Kahoot! at School), for workplaces (Kahoot! at Work), and at home (Kahoot! at Home).  

“Kahoot! is a perfect example of how a culture of innovation plays out in the real world. As a Norwegian company, it thrives in an environment that’s both tech-savvy and open to new digital possibilities,” D’Arcy adds. “The region boasts high levels of digital literacy, creating a population that is not only tech-savvy but also eager to engage with emerging technologies.  

“This combination of governmental backing and a culture of problem solving and collaboration has enabled Nordic businesses to embrace and leverage new digital solutions. As a result, these companies have continuously become leaders across various sectors.” 

Enhancing engagement has been the Kahoot! mission from day one, founded by Morten Versvik, Johan Brand and Jamie Brooker more than 10 years ago, long before education as a general sector was given a shove into online interactions during Covid-19.  

Accessible, meaningful experiences 

It affirms once again, the Nordics’ ability to see opportunities for innovation long before the rest of the world, compounded by an ecosystem that is willing to take a chance on new ideas. 

“Kahoot!’s success reflects the broader mindset in the Nordic region where people are always looking for ways to improve, simplify and engage with digital solutions,” D’Arcy says. “However, it’s not just about using technology for convenience; it’s about creating more accessible, meaningful experiences. 

“We have seen first-hand how Nordic core values such as collaboration, sustainability and forward-thinking have helped shape the success of companies across the region. This culture fosters a connection between businesses and consumers’ needs, allowing companies to anticipate what people will want, often before they even know it themselves.” 

From the oldest of games and past-times, to the most traditional of sectors, the evolution of engagement is being dictated by the Nordic tech scene. 

Source

Posted on

Look to the future: How the threat landscape may evolve next

It’s been quite the half-decade. In fact, it’s hard to know where to start when reflecting on it. The Covid-19 pandemic saw a (forced) mass shift towards hybrid working models, leaving security teams with a new and complex attack surface to secure quickly. Charges made against the CISOs of SolarWinds and Uber set a precedent of legal responsibilities for CISOs when it comes to cyberattacks and reporting. Elsewhere, new regulations are being written into law across the world to protect organisations and consumers everywhere, from NIS2 to the Cyber Resilience Act. Similarly, artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionised cyber security, for good and bad. In some ways, AI has become a helpful ally for security teams when it comes to fighting threats, especially as teams are facing a barrage of new and novel threats daily. On the other hand, the uptick in attacks is likely due to the increased use of AI by cyber criminals to speed up and automate attacks. These notable events are just scratching the (attack) surface!

The cyber industry has always been fast paced and security teams are no stranger to change. However, the last five years have challenged the industry significantly, with the unprecedented volume and sophistication of new threats, talent retention issues and burnout rise. As always, these challenges have exemplified the resilience of the industry. We learn from one another and, as a community, we have become more open to speaking of our collective challenges and helping one another. As we head into the unknown once again, it’s critical that we continue to foster a continued sense of openness and community.

I find ‘predictions’ difficult. This feels like using sticks to find hidden wells of water. I have no crystal ball that will reveal the spring of vulnerabilities going to be released upon us in the next five years. But, I have seen some trends over the past few years that have proven hardy and are representative of significant problems that aren’t going away any time soon. These are the best spots I can look to for what lies ahead.

We might see the quantum computing event horizon in the next five years, in which case, all bets are off. I don’t think that that day will be like the vaunted Y2K that was foretold, but will be more problematic over a longer period of time. It will still be a good amount of time before quantum computing is easily accessible by criminal groups in such a way that will make it an everyday threat…governments protecting secrets though, are in a different boat.

I will also make the very spicy take that the AI, at least in the current form using LLMs or things of a similar stripe, is going to sputter and fall flat. We haven’t seen massive increases in uptake by significant parts of the economy for any of the leading companies, despite them shovelling money into the AI furnace by the billions. There are also reports that the current flavour of AI LLMs have reached their limit, with diminishing returns as there are no longer any major corpuses of human-created data and content to consume and use for training. There, I said it. We are nearing ‘peak AI’. Cue sad trombone.

And now for something completely different…

On a much more serious note, I think the major events relating to cyber security over the next five years will be driven largely by geopolitical crises, starting with China.

Between now and 2030 we will see increased aggression by China with some form of conflict both hot and cold, brought on by the possible ‘annexation’ of Taiwan. China has, for some time, been using police actions (and civilian fishing vessels) to encroach on the territorial sovereignty of regional nations including the Philippines and Taiwan. I worry that what happened in Hong Kong will be tried in a similar way, and these methods for attacking territorial water boundaries will continue, using this playbook in Taiwan, with a diminished role for some traditional western powers. If this comes to pass, and unfortunately it seems that’s the direction things are heading, this will be a cataclysmic global event with truly massive implications. Western-based manufacturers of silicon will become parts of the national security apparatus as critical national infrastructure, in a way that they have escaped thus far but are increasingly moving towards.

More critical national infrastructure will fail in larger ways, due to espionage, conflict or both, like we have seen with the actions of Volt Typhoon and Salt Typhoon, Chinese state-sponsored actors digging into infrastructure like ISPs and telcos and energy companies for use in a future potential conflict and to monitor communications of strategic importance. My fear is that disruption of telcos and other “everyday” critical infrastructure sectors that have not gone as far in their cyber security maturity journey will force governments to assert more explicit control through regulation and direct assistance. And some of this will be long overdue, for in the year 2024, is it really defensible to not require MFA for privileged (or all) users? Or not move away from memory unsafe languages? Or not keep logs on critical system events? These things shouldn’t be acceptable now but I’m afraid it will take an even bigger catastrophe than the cyber crises we’ve endured in the past few years for these requirements to get stated in a sufficiently forceful way that gets some orgs to take note.

Russia will continue its role as global bully, but we will see more cracks emerge when they struggle running out of updates to Windows devices and other western technologies that are no longer available due to sanctions. Russian-based ransomware groups will move in more close alignment with the government and become proxy actors of the Kremlin, even more explicitly than they are now.

Supply chains will get hit, again, and again, and some more. Unfortunately this is a growing trend over the past few years and as we saw with CrowdStrike this year (which wasn’t a supply chain attack…but the disruption of their software caused a global technology event that impacted millions of people, disrupted businesses, cancelled flights, and more) these technologies have become almost irreversibly intertwined with corporate enterprise IT to such an extent that they can cause cascade failures.

Whether the attackers are aggravated aggressor nation-states like Russian and China or neo-organised crime in the form of ransomware gangs, the next years will see disruptions with increasing frequency and magnitude. Eventually there will be a counterforce, deployed by governments, in the form of policy, law and cyber action. My hope for my friends still working in the halls of power in Washington and Whitehall, is that we can mount an effective response to acts of aggression in a way that is proportionate and lasting, not overcorrecting but likewise not wasting an opportunity to help set and enforce some norms around responsible stewardship of user data, technology and public services, as well as norms for conflict in cyberspace that are rooted in our principles and values as a society.

Elliott Wilkes is chief technology officer at Advanced Cyber Defence Systems (ACDS). A seasoned digital transformation leader and product manager, Wilkes has over a decade of experience working with both the American and British governments, most recently as a cyber security consultant to the Civil Service.

Source